Image by Craig Hatfield via FlickrIt's not like he was a scrappy, borderline NBA player--a sort of inner-city Rudy
LeBron James may in fact be short on loyalty, for all I know. But this instance seems like kind of a distorted use of the word.
Do you owe loyalty to someone who won you in a lottery? Yes, after they won you, they were very nice to you and paid you a lot of money and hung up giant pictures of you, telling you all the while how much they looooovey-lovey-LOVE you! But anybody else who won you would've done the same thing. So what makes the people who won you any more deserving of loyalty than anybody else? They're luckier?
Loyalty implies a commitment to someone who has earned loyalty through a previous act of support or sacrifice. If you give extraordinary support to someone who hasn't given you extraordinary benefits in the past, that's not loyalty, that's charity. Both are good things, but they're different.
I think that what Cleveland fans are asking for is more like charity. "Forget what you want and stay with us, LeBron! Because we're the team you played for last year!" But people who are asking for charity often don't like to think that they're asking for charity, so they disguise it as something else. They convince themselves that they are owed something, and if you deny it, then that's a character flaw on your part. Disloyalty! After we were so good to you! And to think of all those times I kept myself from cursing out your mother when you missed a free throw!
Whether LeBron made the right decision remains to be seen. But the more I see the reaction of the Cleveland fans, the more I'm glad he wasn't guilt-tripped into staying based on dubious claims on his loyalty.

No comments:
Post a Comment